August 29, 2010
Posted by Rev. Ryan
Doctor What
I’ve been meaning to write a blog about Doctor Who for a while now. As one of my favourite TV shows, let alone sci-fi shows, it’s been keeping me blissfully entertained since it returned to television in 2005. To my mind, the actors portraying the Doctor since its revamp are fantastic, and every time a new Doctor arrives my initial scepticism is blown away.
I liked Matt Smith’s portrayal of the title character since those final few moments of The End of Time (David Tennant’s final appearance as Doctor number 10); here was a Doctor who wasn’t going to fall in love with his human companion, who saw things through an alien viewpoint, and his portrayal has harked back to when the Doctor was an extra-terrestrial, as opposed to the human-with-two-hearts idea which has been en vogue since Paul McGann tried his hand in the role (and for the record, Paul McGann’s 8th Doctor is my second favourite Doctor). I don’t mind the human portrayal, but it’s also nice to buck the trend, which is something the 11th Doctor does in spades.
But this is more of a rant than a tribute, I’m afraid.
Steven Moffat took the reigns after Tennant’s final stint and decided to act the teenager. As teenagers do when they leave their parents, they rebel. So the wallpaper changed – new logo, new theme tune, new sonic screwdriver, new companion – and so did the entire format of the show. Gone was the deep characterisation that made the new series so strong, to be replaced with pithy one-liners from Amy Pond, if only to allow her to live up to the sassy label everyone was so keen to lump onto her. This lack of characterisation made the Doctor better, in my opinion; he seemed utterly eccentric, mad at times and brilliant always. Amy Pond, on the other hand, just got lost in the series, starting out as a great idea for a character and turning into something in the background to constantly annoy the viewer.
All of this I forgive. It’s the evolution of the series that makes it what it is, and there are several stand out episodes from 11′s first series (these being the stirring Vincent and the Doctor, The Lodger (despite James Corden) and The Eleventh Hour). The two gripes I have about the series revolve around Steven Moffat.
Moffat was the undisputed hero of the Russell T. Davies era of Doctor Who, providing the series with the darkest, cleverest and most satisfying episodes, not to mention terrifying at times. But it seems that he’s gotten too big for his boots. “Let’s just change everything.” It just seems a little desperate, especially since the budget this time around isn’t high enough to meet the expectations laid down. He’s bigged up and bigged up and bigged up and what is actually produced is on a par with the wooden sets of the 70s.
But it’s the new announcement that the next series of Doctor Who is going to be split up to allow more gimmicky “event episodes” which gets me really annoyed. What the series was so good at was the writing and the characters. Instead of concentrating on such a thing – which, if done well, can completely outshine the budgetary constraints (see Clerks, for example, where the dialogue was fantastic) – he’s opting for the easy option of ratings winning cliffhangers.
I’m trying not to hate, here. Blink, The Girl in the Fireplace and the Silence In The Library episodes are my ultimate favourites of the revamp, and like I said, I love Matt Smith’s Doctor. It’s the fact that I love the series so much that makes me angry when it seems like power is being abused. What I’m essentially getting at here, is: Steven Moffat, stop trying so hard. You’re an amazing writer, so let the writing win out!
I suppose that’s it. I do have more to say on the matter, but I’m boring you as it is.